Is the United States a "Christian nation"? Some Americans think so.
Religious Right activists and right-wing television preachers often claim that the United States was founded to be a Christian nation. Even some politicians agree. If the people who make this assertion are merely saying that most Americans are Christians, they might have a point. But those who argue that America is a Christian nation usually mean something more, insisting that the country should be officially Christian.
The very character of our country is at stake in the outcome of this debate.
Religious Right groups and their allies insist that the United States was designed to be officially Christian and that our laws should enforce the doctrines of their version of Christianity. Is this viewpoint accurate? Is there anything in the Constitution that gives special treatment or preference to Christianity?
Did the founders of our government believe this or intend to create a government that gave special recognition to Christianity? The answer to all of these questions is no. The U. Constitution is a wholly secular document. It contains no mention of Christianity or Jesus Christ. In fact, the Constitution refers to religion only twice in the First Amendment, which bars laws "respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," and in Article VI, which prohibits "religious tests" for public office. Both of these provisions are evidence that the country was not founded as officially Christian.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;.
- The Old Girls Book of Spells: The Real Meaning of Menopause, Sex, Car Keys, and Other Importanat Stuff About Magic?
- History of the United States, Forming a new nation - ydynujanig.tk!
- The Road Ahead Is Packed With Big Issues, and Here Are 10 of the Biggest..
The Founding Fathers did not create a secular government because they disliked religion. Many were believers themselves. Yet they were well aware of the dangers of church-state union.
They had studied and even seen first-hand the difficulties that church-state partnerships spawned in Europe. During the American colonial period, alliances between religion and government produced oppression and tyranny on our own shores. Many colonies, for example, had provisions limiting public office to "Trinitarian Protestants" and other types of laws designed to prop up the religious sentiments of the politically powerful.
Some colonies had officially established churches and taxed all citizens to support them, whether they were members or not.
Dissenters faced imprisonment, torture and even death. These arrangements led to bitterness and sectarian division. Many people began agitating for an end to "religious tests" for public office, tax subsidies for churches and other forms of state endorsement of religion. Those who led this charge were not anti-religion. Indeed, many were members of the clergy and people of deep piety. They argued that true faith did not need or want the support of government. Most critical to determining control of the chamber are likely to be prosperous, culturally dynamic suburbs — around cities like New York, Philadelphia, Detroit, Miami, Chicago and Los Angeles — where Republicans are defending several dozen districts packed with voters in open revolt against Mr.
Democrats have won over many swing voters in these areas with a message focused on Republican health care and tax policies that are even less popular than the president himself. The fate of Republican lawmakers in the East Coast suburbs could offer an early harbinger on election night of whether the party can maintain even a tenuous grip on the House.
Many of those communities could also tip powerful governorships into Democratic hands for the first time in a decade. Former Gov.
PMQs verdict: Corbyn exposes May's empty offer of cross-party Brexit talks
Ted Strickland of Ohio, the last Democrat to lead that state, said the election had effectively become a referendum on Mr. Strickland said of the president. Trump has appeared to turn his attention in the last few days away from the effort to keep control of the House, and toward shoring up Republicans in coveted Senate races. He has focused predominantly on electrifying the right rather than soothing some of the swing voters who backed him over Hillary Clinton two years ago. In the final weeks of campaigning, Mr. Trump has delivered slashing attacks on immigration, railing against birthright citizenship, linking immigration without evidence to violent crime and amplifying debunked conspiracy theories about a migrant caravan in Latin America.
In a possible portent of how he might react to electoral defeat, Mr. Trump lashed out at House Speaker Paul D. Ryan on Twitter after Mr. Ryan criticized his dubious proposal to void the constitutional guarantee of citizenship to anyone born on American soil. Trump was offering them in his final argument.
Juvenile Life Without Parole: An Overview | The Sentencing Project
Likening the election to a tug of war, Ms. Matthews said the president was trying to energize his predominantly white and male base even as moderate women recoil from him. Matthews said. Even before his lunge toward culture-war rhetoric, Mr.
Establishing a government
Trump and his party appeared to be receiving scant political advantage from the state of the economy, which has grown steadily during his presidency and pushed the unemployment rate below 4 percent. A dip in the stock market over the final weeks of the campaign appeared to frustrate Mr.
Johnson & Johnson opioid trial judge expected to issue landmark verdict Monday
Markets Pre-Markets U. Republican allies blast Trump's decision to hand northern Syria Politics read more. Alibaba shopping sites appear to have de-listed Houston Rockets China Politics read more. China surveillance tech is spreading, raising concerns about Technology read more.
Markets read more. Elizabeth Warren could be 'even tougher than Trump' on China,